🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.