🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial policy to prohibit social media access for young people below 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are watching intently to see if this strategy will set a precedent for countries abroad.

European Trend

In Europe, a rising number of countries are moving toward similar restrictions.

• The Danish government plans a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the PM arguing that smartphones and networks are "stealing our children's innocence". Legislation is expected to be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is set to enforce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard the young from the "power of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is working on a digital wallet to confirm the user details of social media account holders. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "a potential tools on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has asked the legislature to enact a law increasing the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a comparable move, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in the Netherlands has advised families to restrict their children from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has approved a symbolic statement calling for a ban for under-16s unless a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these services, the resolution does not establish binding law.

"An effective age restriction is a useful starting point," stated the parliamentarian behind the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but stressing any policy must be "based on robust evidence".

Last year, interest grew behind a bill to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the administration committed to further research the topic.

Charities have raised apprehensions. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a teenager who was lost after being exposed to disturbing online content argues that a blanket age ban might not make platforms safer and could create a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the refusal of the social media companies to build tools that are safe and age appropriate for children," commented a leading child protection advocate.

The United States: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, regulation is primarily occurring at the regional level amid country-wide stalemate.

• Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a law prohibiting under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has passed a regulation limiting minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further time needing a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced bills demanding adult authorization for minors to open social media accounts.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from certain politicians to copy this lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Global Perspectives

Apart from the West, further states are also taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

But, world agencies take a more cautious position. Unicef has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The agency notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to improve user protection.

As this global conversation evolves, the actions of this nation and others indicate that governments around the world are less and less willing to delay for platforms to self-regulate.